Independent credit compliance guidanceFor lending, compliance and risk teams
CreditCompliance.help
United Kingdom and EU Member States · Research guide

What Must Lenders Do After a Missed Payment?

After an instalment appears unpaid, verify the agreement, amount due, actual receipts, payment dates and any authorised schedule change. A declined card request or rejected direct debit may require follow-up but does not independently settle the legal balance if another payment method succeeded.

Sources checked · 2026-10-12 · 5 min read

Definition and immediate issue: Verify the apparent shortfall

After an instalment appears unpaid, verify the agreement, amount due, actual receipts, payment dates and any authorised schedule change. A declined card request or rejected direct debit may require follow-up but does not independently settle the legal balance if another payment method succeeded. Investigate disputed charges and posting delays. A credible account reconciliation should precede consumer-facing statements about arrears, charges or legal consequences. Assign the case to the entity responsible for the obligation. The account and legal classification should be recorded by a named owner. Where different teams manage sales, servicing and collections, the handoff must preserve the original contract facts and relevant customer messages. An internal process label cannot change a statutory condition or remove an available consumer remedy.

Contractual and statutory distinction: Identify formal notice obligations

UK law includes prescribed notices of sums in arrears for particular regulated credit agreements and default notice requirements before specified remedies in certain circumstances. The Consumer Credit Act 1974 and associated regulations must be checked against the product and trigger. An ordinary reminder is not necessarily a statutory notice, and a formal notice should not be generated merely from an internal overdue-day bucket. EU Member State requirements may differ. Keep a mapped legal source, relevant calculation, document version and dispatch record for each prescribed communication. The reviewer should document the law effective at the time, the actual event that triggers the obligation and the record demonstrating that the required action occurred. Different types of notice should not be merged into a single correspondence category for convenience. Escalate questions of interpretation before representing a legal consequence as certain.

Customer information and contact: Explain the issue accurately

A useful early message identifies the account, the payment apparently missed, how the customer can resolve a posting error and how to discuss difficulty. The firm should not threaten enforcement that is not legally available. UK FCA CONC 7.9 contains contact conduct requirements, including identifying the caller's role and purpose and avoiding unreasonable contact times. An accessible reply route matters when the consumer cannot use an online portal. Communications should reflect any existing arrangement rather than demand an obsolete amount. Communication design must account for accessibility and the risk of confusing multiple companies involved in the credit. A customer may know the merchant's name rather than the creditor's. A clear explanation of the responsible entity, balance and contact route reduces the risk of mistaken payment and repeated, unnecessary interactions.

Individual circumstances and support: Respond to financial difficulty

A borrower reporting a sustained inability to pay or a change in circumstances requires appropriate review under applicable forbearance rules. UK CONC 7.3 requires relevant firms to provide forbearance and due consideration. Staff should distinguish a disputed payment from a consumer seeking a temporary reduction, payment pause or broader debt advice. No single concession is an unconditional right for all products. Record alternatives, anticipated balance changes and the basis on which an option was accepted or declined. Individual assessment does not require every type of concession to be offered. It requires attention to applicable law and the facts known about the consumer. Consider whether an arrangement would be sustainable, how it might affect the balance and when a review is appropriate. Limit collection of sensitive personal details to what is necessary and lawful.

Servicing consequences: Fees, reporting and collections

Default fees, contractual interest, credit reference reporting and third-party recovery each have distinct legal controls. A generic collections stage does not establish whether a charge is permitted or which information may be reported. Confirm the lender's legal and contractual authority before taking action. Check whether a payment plan is already in place and whether an automated collection request would conflict with it. Where a customer disputes the amount, document the evidence considered and corrections made. Reconcile separate systems before making statements about fees, credit files or debt ownership. A payment holiday or corrected arrears balance must flow through all relevant customer-facing systems. Test repeated demands after a complaint or agreement change and verify that errors can be corrected through an accountable process.

Jurisdiction and CCD2 transition: Preparing for CCD2

Directive (EU) 2023/2225 Article 35 establishes revised EU rules for reasonable forbearance before enforcement where appropriate. National measures generally apply from 20 November 2026, subject to transition and scope. A current UK FCA obligation should not be cited as an EU-wide present requirement. A firm should assess its portfolio by product, Member State, contract date and relevant implementing law. Changes to notices, systems and training should have explicit owners and effective dates. The implementation timetable should be held separately from present legal obligations. National transposition, application and transitional provisions affect when revised measures govern particular agreements. Keep evidence of legal sign-off and operational testing rather than assuming an EU Directive supplies an identical workflow across countries.

Evidence and operational testing: A reproducible response workflow

Maintain a dated record of account reconciliation, legal notices considered, customer messages, hardship information lawfully collected, decisions and follow-up. Test cases should include payment errors, a single short delay, recurring missed instalments, disputed fees and customers with accessibility needs. Review whether reminder automation sends contradictory messages after payment or an agreed concession. An auditor should be able to trace the rule and original account evidence, not simply the final status displayed on the screen. Use sampling that tests edge cases as well as ordinary accounts. Retain the documents, transaction evidence, legal source, decisions and consumer communications from the period reviewed. Record systemic defects and verify corrections with fresh cases. A control is not effective solely because a procedure says the required step should occur.

Frequently asked questions

Does one late payment automatically mean legal default?

No. Account records, contractual terms and statutory requirements determine the consequences.

Do the same deadlines apply to every UK and EU loan?

No. Product scope and national law determine notice and contact requirements.

When do revised CCD2 national measures generally apply?

20 November 2026, subject to relevant national transition rules.

Operating frameworks on this page are editorial suggestions. Apply the legal text and current national requirements to the actual product facts; these methods do not determine compliance.

Primary sources

FCA CONC 7.3 ↗FCA CONC 7.9 ↗Directive (EU) 2023/2225 ↗Consumer Credit Act 1974 ↗

Read the source in its current version. National implementing measures and product-specific applicability may require additional research.

Related research

credit arrears and forbearance compliance ↗

When Should a Lender Contact a Borrower in Arrears? ↗