Independent credit compliance guidanceFor lending, compliance and risk teams
CreditCompliance.help
United Kingdom and EU Member States · Research guide

Handling Arrears Complaints and Disputes

Arrears complaints can challenge an unallocated payment, an incorrect balance, a late fee, debt collection conduct or an unaffordable payment arrangement. Identify the exact issue rather than treating the complaint as a refusal to pay. A complaint about accuracy and a request for hardship support may coexist. The creditor should confirm account identity, relevant contract and chronology before deciding what the evidence shows.

Sources checked · 2026-10-12 · 4 min read

Understanding the problem

Arrears complaints can challenge an unallocated payment, an incorrect balance, a late fee, debt collection conduct or an unaffordable payment arrangement. Identify the exact issue rather than treating the complaint as a refusal to pay. A complaint about accuracy and a request for hardship support may coexist. The creditor should confirm account identity, relevant contract and chronology before deciding what the evidence shows. Record the specific credit agreement, responsible legal entity and applicable jurisdiction before applying a procedure. The same customer experience can have different legal consequences under a regulated instalment loan, an overdraft or a mortgage. Avoid substituting internal service standards for binding requirements. A dated rule-to-control map helps staff identify when specialist review is necessary and which evidence they must retain.

Applicable regulatory duties

UK FCA DISP complaint rules can apply to relevant firms and complainants, alongside applicable CONC 7 duties on collections and forbearance. Establish whether the activity and person fall within scope instead of assigning one UK deadline to every dispute worldwide. In EU Member States, local complaint procedures, dispute resolution and consumer-law routes must be checked. Maintain a legal source reference for the response process. A policy statement is not proof that a consumer was treated fairly. Case notes should show what information was actually available to staff, which legally relevant circumstances they considered and how the resulting decision was communicated. Distinguish binding rules from regulatory guidance, including any national provisions applicable to the agreement. Oversight should cover outsourced servicing and technology-driven contact as well as in-house casework.

Accessible customer communication

Reconcile the ledger against bank transfers, direct debit records, interest charges, agreement variations and notices. Do not rely solely on the collections dashboard if the borrower supplies contradictory evidence. Keep copies of the facts considered and corrections made. Where a complaint concerns debt ownership or identity, establish that the firm is pursuing the correct person and has authority to respond. Contact controls should consider the consumer's ability to respond and understand information. An unanswered message may reflect an accessibility problem or incorrect address rather than unwillingness to engage. Test communications across available channels, including failures of digital authentication. Keep the record sufficiently clear that another trained reviewer can identify the purpose, timing, sender and the actual next step.

Individual assessment

Automated collections activity may create harm when an account is under genuine investigation. Whether all activity should pause depends on the applicable law and case facts, but misleading demands should be avoided. Staff should know how to flag disputes, stop inappropriate automated messages and escalate possible data errors. Record the reason for any temporary hold and what activity remains legally necessary. A review of circumstances must be proportionate to the decision. Avoid gathering unnecessary sensitive information while ensuring financial figures and account history are reliable. A repayment proposal should not be accepted solely because it fits a standard template if it appears unlikely to be sustained. Record available alternatives, expected impact on future payments and why a different choice was not suitable.

Servicing and operational controls

Explain the outcome, any corrected balance, refunded charge, revised arrangement or further complaint route. In the UK an eligible complaint may have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service under relevant rules. Do not claim that the European Commission itself adjudicates individual lending disputes. Use verified country-specific external resolution information and accurate complaint communications. Operations teams should connect the decision with actual account servicing. A corrected balance, agreed payment reduction or changed communication preference must flow through the systems generating statements and reminders. Test for contradictory letters and duplicate demands. The staff member responsible for a decision needs access to the relevant past contacts and a route to escalate matters beyond their authority.

National law and CCD2 transition

If a borrower describes financial difficulty while challenging a fee, also consider whether the circumstances trigger a forbearance review. The dispute does not automatically extinguish contractual sums, and a hardship request does not prove the balance is correct. CCD2 Article 35 is part of the revised EU framework generally applying from 20 November 2026 and is distinct from the resolution of disputed account facts. Changes to EU law and domestic regulation require controlled review. Identify which obligations apply now and which national implementing measures are expected later. The CCD2 national application date does not itself settle product scope or transitional rules. Keep UK FCA requirements distinct from EU Member State frameworks and avoid claims that a consumer can demand an identical concession in every country.

Evidence, testing and review

Test partial payments, wrong allocations, a disputed penalty, confusing third-party correspondence and a complaint about repeated phone calls. Maintain the original complaint, evidence, reasoning, response and any compensation or correction. Analyse repeat errors for improvements to systems and outsourcing oversight. Review whether subsequent statements and collection messages reflected the final decision. Quality assurance should include ordinary cases and edge cases, not only successful resolutions. Review errors in payment allocation, contact frequency, representative authority, changing customer circumstances and escalations. Preserve documents as they stood at the relevant time. Where failures recur, assign a corrective action to a responsible owner and verify that the modified process works.

Frequently asked questions

Do the same rules govern all EU consumer credit products?

No. Assess the agreement, national law and applicable regulatory scope.

Does a request for support automatically cancel a debt?

No. The balance and applicable response must be assessed separately.

Operating frameworks on this page are editorial suggestions. Apply the legal text and current national requirements to the actual product facts; these methods do not determine compliance.

Primary sources

FCA Handbook CONC 7 ↗FCA Handbook DISP ↗Directive (EU) 2023/2225 ↗

Read the source in its current version. National implementing measures and product-specific applicability may require additional research.

Related research

arrears and forbearance compliance ↗

Supporting Vulnerable Borrowers in Arrears ↗